Haoles in Hawai‘i
Judy Rohrer
Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2010
xii + 124pp.
by Alexander Mawyer, Lake Forest College, Dept. of Sociology and Anthropology
Judy Rohrer’s potent Haoles in Hawai‘i illuminates highly charged categories of personhood in a Hawai‘i sometimes characterized as free from the fraught politics of race familiar in other U.S. contexts. Inspired by and drawing on recent work by Native Hawaiian scholars who have systematically demonstrated that long-enduring narratives about Hawaiian history and society are illusions that place the islands’ true histories under erasure, she suggests that the well circulated story of the islands as an ethnic or racial melting-pot is the insidious Western fantasy of paradise extended to the fabric of social relations. Resulting in processes of historical displacement and disconnection, such erasures simultaneously support odious legacies of the domination of Hawai‘i by foreign elites since the nineteenth century and the political annexation of the islands by the United States. Against this historical backdrop, Rohrer critically reexamines the narratives and putative common-sense understandings of haoles as a socially privileged class. Whiteness studies, the social construction of personhood with particular attention to race, discourse analysis of the presence of ponderous history, and barbed politics in everyday conversations—all these are deployed in service of making sense of the category of haole across island contexts from classrooms to courtrooms. Haole is not, Rohrer notes, a natural category but one that emerged and changed over time and requires considerable scholarly attention to its historical, social, and cultural dimensions.
Though Haoles in Hawai‘i is a slender volume, the reader will be struck by the author’s offerings of numerous profound and stimulating conversations with ‘ohana, neighbors, colleagues, and strangers met across the aisle of the new Tamura’s in Barber’s Point, while paddling out to the break at Makaha Beach, or in line at the Starbucks on Kapahulu Avenue. A central theme of the work is that the history of social personhood in the Hawaiian islands is complicated. It is not enough to note that there are Native Hawaiians, locals, and haole persons. The content and lived experience of each of these categories is overlapping, performative, politically charged, sometimes ironic, sometimes deadly serious, and changing in time. Certainly, Rohrer argues, race matters in the fiftieth state, as it does elsewhere within the U.S. political sphere. At the same time, she notes, “race works differently in the islands than on the continent, including being an everyday part of conversations” (68), and the different groups that make up Hawai‘i’s society would benefit from a renewed broader conversation about the politics of personhood with attention to racialization. It is to this conversation that Haoles in Hawai‘i most directly seeks to contribute. However, Rohrer’s work also will be of broad interest to scholars of race and ethnicity and to those in the emerging field of whiteness studies.
In an important chapter, Rohrer sensitively and incisively critiques broadly circulating claims—e.g., in local media, state courts, the national legislature—that haole have somehow become victims. With historical sensitivity, and penetrating simplicity, she observes that programs and social structures supporting the Kanaka Maoli, Native Hawaiian community, do not erode or damage the status of other communities in Hawai‘i. Does social life need to be conceived or experienced as a zero-sum game? Many readers will be interested in Rohrer’s analysis of the conversational, performative aspect of haole. Being haole is not simply a matter of one’s skin, place of origin, or enduring concrete identity, though all of these features of our identities, among others, may indeed matter. Being haole is also a matter of how one acts and interacts, of attitude, understanding, affect and emotional life. Drawing on a particularly telling anecdote, Rohrer asks readers consider at least three kinds of haole personhood—haole, dumb haole, ****ing dumb haole—in and out of which individuals move, some more or less regularly than others. She also notes that these categories can include Native Hawaiian or other local persons as well.
In a critical point, also woven throughout, and drawing on the underlying observation that categorizing ‘others’ is a human universal, she notes that social processes of categorizing and labeling selves and others is not only a means of making sense of the world around us but is also caught up in collective attempts to impose order upon it. In the colonial context of Hawai‘i’s long nineteenth and twentieth centuries, this is evident in such Western labels as native, savage, primitive, and bush, which often were brought to bear on Native Hawaiian persons as part of their political, social, and material disenfranchisement—or dismemberment, in Osorio’s sense. For Native Hawaiians, the everyday use of the term haole can sometimes be seen as a form of subtle resistance to colonial hegemony over the very categories of social life. If not able to dissolve the colonial context, such improvisational play with ‘race’ can be argued to offer Kanaka Maoli persons the means to exert control over aspects of the colonial, for instance as a subtly potent localization of others in indigenous terms. The inability of Euro-Americans to wrest semantic control of the term haole away from Native Hawaiian and other local persons thus stands as evidence of the enduring dignity and commitment to cultural identity in a long period of political and social domination.
Rohrer’s significant work will serve as a prolegomena to future studies of haole and other categories of person in Hawai‘i. I trust Haoles in Hawai‘i will be read and discussed by many with felicitous results for readers and the collectives they constitute alike.